
 
			 "Who's" Your
				Daddy?
 
			 by Jim
				Bray
 
			 Columbia Tristar has tried to right a wrong with its Superbit
				release of the classic Who rock opera. The original
				DVD featured a very good picture as well as offering the movie's original
				"Quintophonic" soundtrack, but the 1970's vintage audio was thin and relied far
				too much on the surround channels for musical instruments rather than the more
				common practice of today of using the surrounds mostly for effects.
 
			 So is the Superbit Tommy truly an Amazing Journey capable of
				bringing Eyesight to the Blind?
 
			 Well, yes and no. It's definitely better than the original, but
				despite the engineers' best attempts one can't make a silk purse out of a sow's
				ear.
 
			 Okay, that may be a tad unfair; it's eminently watchable even if
				we were still disappointed in the audio quality.
 
			 More about that later.
 
			 Pete Townshend
				was once quoted as saying that if anyone could make a movie out of his first
				Rock Opera masterpiece, it would be Ken Russell.
 
			 And, as it
				turns out, that's exactly who made it - though whether or not Russell made a
				good movie out of the 1969 Who album is another question altogether -
				and it may depend a lot upon your age and how many "substances" you've
				ingested.
 
			 And either DVD
				release of Tommy, but especially this Superbit one, offers by far the best
				video incarnation of this rock vision. Not only does it offer the best picture
				quality yet, but as mentioned above they've returned "Tommy" to its original
				audio roots: with the Sansui/QS matrix "Quintaphonic" five channel
				audio.
 
			 Now, five
				channel audio is what we expect from a modern movie/DVD, but in 1975 it was
				innovative in the extreme. Quintophonic was replaced shortly after Tommy by
				Dolby Surround, which was a lot more efficient to put on film than the
				magnetically-based Quintaphonic.
 
			 I first saw
				"Tommy" in Spokane, Washington, in its original Quintaphonic glory and it was
				an exciting experience. As the posters and commercials said "Your senses will
				never be the same" - except that during the showing my wife and I attended the
				surround channels kept turning on and off quite annoyingly.
 
			 Columbia
				Tristar deserves a lot of credit for resurrecting the 5 channel audio tracks
				(the original DVD also offered two channel surround, though as in Superbit
				tradition that choice is eliminated from the new disc). But having listened to
				real quadraphonic sound for many years and then gotten used to Dolby Digital
				surround, "Tommy's" Quintaphonic leaves a lot to be desired. The producers seem
				to have spent so much energy surrounding you with whiz bang sound that they
				forgot the front left and right channels. 
 
			 In our home
				theater, the sound came mostly from the center and the surround channels, and
				(maybe because theater speakers were anything but high fidelity back then) the
				sound is quite thin, with little "ooomph" to it. The late John Entwistle and
				the other bassists used on the soundtrack might as well not have showed up in
				the studio for all the low frequency that makes it from the
				speakers.
			 Mostly, anyway.
				"The Acid Queen" and "Eyesight to the Blind" offer fairly good bass, but
				they're the exception that proves the rule.
 
			 It's too bad.
				You can crank the volume up as much as you want (and believe me, we
				want. This is WHO MUSIC!!!!), but you won't rattle the walls. Oh, the
				Superbit versions are appreciably better, especially the DTS soundtrack, though
				only a bit louder, than the original DVD, but if you want the Who in all their
				decibel-searing glory, get the "Live At Royal Albert Hall" DVD which, with the
				Live at Leeds remaster, are the only recordings that really do the Who's raw
				power justice.
 
			 I suspect this
				isn't the studio's fault. There's a nice essay included with the original DVD
				that outlines the process they used for restoring the audio, and of course the
				Superbit treatment is also meant to best exploit the sonic potential, so it
				looks like they did their best. The problem was likely with the technology of
				the time or the way they applied it. 
 
			 After all, even
				the CD soundtrack sounds compressed and muddy...
 
			 For anyone
				who's been living under a rock (or far from Rock) for the past thirty years,
				Tommy is the story (as much as there is a story to what's essentially a very
				fine concept album) of a boy rendered deaf dumb and blind by a childhood
				trauma, but who overcomes his handicap to become a champion pinball player.
				Later (on side three, for people who remember vinyl records), another trauma
				cures him and he uses his new freedom and his wealth and celebrity to found a
				religion. This ultimately blows up in his face and his flock revolts, leaving
				Tommy isolated and lonely and singing "See Me, Feel Me."
 
			 But Who cares
				about the story. It's The Who's music that's worth the price of admission, and
				the Tommy movie featured a couple of new Townshend songs and a completely new,
				synthesizer-laden arrangement. It's very good, though it's also very "1970's"
				and though it worked very well at the time, you can't beat the original album
				for sheer musical quality. 
 
			 The 1990's
				Broadway musical wisely returned to the rock roots of the music and did a very
				fine job, leaving the cinematic "Tommy" soundtrack as a very listenable time
				capsule of an overproduced electronic era - though if one had to use layers of
				synthesizers, Townshend was probably the best to do it.
 
			 The Superbit
				DVD is presented in its original widescreen aspect ratio and, as mentioned, the
				picture quality is excellent, with rich colors and a sharp image that belies
				Tommy's age and relatively low budget. Is it appreciably better than the
				original DVD? Well, no; the original disc was excellent, picture-wise, so while
				the Superbit process does improve it subtly you really have to watch for it.
				
			 I've already
				opined ad nauseam about the audio (which, in Superbit trdition is offered in
				both Dolby Digital and DTS surround), so I shan't comment upon it further.
				
 
			 As with most
				Superbit titles, you lose the extras to gain the audio/video quality and that's
				fine with me. 
 
			 Despite my
				disappointment in the sound quality, this is clearly the best "Tommy" to have
				ever been released on home video, so if you're a Who fan or a Tommy fan, you'll
				want it in your collection.
 
			 
      Tommy - the Superbit 
        version, from Columbia Tristar Home Video
        111 minutes, Widescreen (1.85:1), 16x9 TV compatible, Dolby Digital 5.1 
        and DTS audio
        Starring Ann-Margret, Oliver Reed, Roger Daltrey, Elton John, Tina Turner, 
        Eric Clapton, Jack Nicholson, Keith Moon, and The Who.
        Produced by Robert Stigwood and Ken Russell, Based on the Rock Opera by 
        Pete Townshend (with songs by John Entwistle, Keith Moon and Sonny Boy 
        Williamson) 
         Directed by Ken
				Russell
      
              
              
        
		  		     
		  		    Tell us at TechnoFile what YOU think